The Anti- English Racism Of Ratna Dutt.

Daily Mail reports new births as the following: 64.4% WHITE BRITISH, 8.7% Asian, 5.1% Irish/Other White, 5% Black, 3.5% Mixed Race, 2.4% Chinese/Other, 10.9% Unrecorded.
Ratna Dutt of the Race Equality Foundation says "Britain is more racially diverse than ever, which is brilliant."
Her thinly disguised anti-English racism is plain to see. I mean, how can anyone who loves diversity think of the world as a more diverse place with the extinction of the English? (A mathmatical certainty if the immigration and immigrant birth issues aren't addressed?)
Does she think the U.S. to be a beacon for multi-racialism with no Native Americas to speak of?

Perhaps she'll use that old chestnut, "the English are a mongrel race so can't claim a racial identity anyway".
Oblivious to the fact that immigrants in Birtain each claim their seperate identities loudly and clearly (indeed, with public funds and government legislation to 'encourage' their expansion) so, mongrel race or not, we who are left still have a distinct English identity and a right to protect it.
It's also the only identity who's entire existence is being determined here.

The truth is all countries have had historic migrations. It's just that until recently (i.e. world travel opportunities) all those migrations have been from the SURROUNDING areas of those countries. All of a similar RACIAL and CULTURAL identity.
That is why only recently have we British had anything more than a few percent of non-white and also why until recently we were one of the least divided, most homogeneous nations on earth.
And why it is IMPOSSIBLE for us absorb world migration without becoming a Balkanised set of REGIONS each backed by a M.N.C. controlled E.U. or other international body. (Ie. E.U. regional policy funding.)

"Forty years ago visitors described Britain as homogeneous. That unlike the U.S. and other comparable countries there were relatively few important lines of division. Whereas race, religion and territory divided other countries they did not in Britain."
Politics U.K. 5th Edition.

Illegal Immigrants And 'Cloning.'

'Cloning' is when an illegal immigrant uses a legal 'friends' passport and N.I. number to obtain work. The illegal could be a terrorist, drug-trafficker, gun-trafficker, or pretty much anything, and the security check would be on his 'friend'.
This means the rapist who attacked that woman in the illegal immigrant camp in Calais, France could work with our children.
For surely, he like all the others there, will try, try, and try again until they get here.
Hundreds of thousand of illegals here and hundreds of thousands more to come.
Of whom we know, will know nothing.

The Problem With People...

"THE PROBLEM WITH MOST PEOPLE IS THAT THEY DON'T BELIEVE SOMETHING CAN HAPPEN UNLESS IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE IN LIVING MEMORY." -Origin8.

“…we’re now entering terrifying new times…”, (Daily Mail - April 22nd, 2008).

I cannot help but agree with this assessment. However I feel that little has been written by journalists regarding the true fundamental crisis and danger that we are facing. That being the emergence of a new ‘Divine Rule’, or globalisation as it is euphemistically called.

Specifically I am referring to the power of M.N.C.’s to control the very stuff of existence itself. Food, water, and fuel.
And the growing impotency of democratically elected governments to be anything more than trumped-up pressure groups who’s success in effecting these business controlled international bodies is dependent on the wealth of their particular country rather than the natural rights of all people. Indeed, perhaps even one step further in that the drop in public participation in elections being equal to the rise in membership of pan-national pressure groups may well eventually spell the end of government itself. Representation of the people then becoming an issue based rather than nationally based exercise.

However for the moment we seem to be heading towards national governments and internationally ‘elected’ bodies becoming nothing more than managerial tiers between M.N.C.’s and 99% of the world’s population. The latter becoming a vast ‘drifting’ workforce, homeless, troubled, and without identity, inevitably congregating far more on one side of the earth than another. And as this creates racial, religious, and territorial conflict (balkanisation) we find ourselves having simply swapped what Classical Liberalism (globalisation) was meant to end, i.e. international conflict, for nation state civil wars.

This assessment of national government’s collusion with the repulsive corporate giants would seem to be bourn out when examining the current ‘credit crunch’. For it is here we clearly see an inappropriate relationship between public service and private enterprise. Government ignores these criminally negligent banking executives and their greed-based risk-taking and instead actually sees fit to sit back and do nothing while these same institutions increase the costs and charges on their already victimised customers in an effort to claw back some of their own losses.

While the British government’s token attempt to regulate (i.e. the pitiful F.S.A) not only has no teeth, but is run and funded by the banking elite themselves.

Perhaps the most awful thing to note is how the vile Blair, who orchestrated this criminal de-regulation along with the equally repulsive Brown, has been offered very lucrative appointments within this same elitist system.
Make of that what you will.

I am sure others know better than I the statistics regarding the growing control of world trade that these M.N.C.’s have. Some 75% is it? We see our high streets disappearing more and more under the weight of chain store outlets and now the U.S. firm United Health has won the contract to take over three Camden G.P. surgeries.
Once only the laundry was tendered out to nameless, apathetic organisations swallowed up by their parent M.N.C.’s. Now it is to be the most intimate moments of people’s lives.

And what of more domestic issues? What has changed that we have lost so much social capital? The gulf between the rich and poor has always been there. Despite the current shameful statistics it was still worse in the 1930’s for instance. Children growing up faster today? Absurd! From the children singing ring-a-ring-a-roses to those children who were to grow up to pilot Hurricanes and Spitfires with courage and fortitude in World War Two, the only real difference today is that we sell our children adult images and then say that they understand the concepts when in fact understanding the REALITY is what’s important.
Because only with reality comes consequence.

What else then?
Well the overwhelming problem is the vast amount of legislation needed to both control and enforce our globalised multi-culture. Consequently much of policy is devolved to the non-elected civil service/private enterprise sector. And with no time or inclination to properly regulate these self-interest bodies, unhindered greed collapses the economy leaving a completely bemused and angry populace wondering how such activity was allowed to occur.

In short government is swamped under a business-backed, non-elected, unnatural, and increasingly violent globalised multi-culture.
And the mass of legislation needed to enforce it.
This creates aimless and dangerous consensus politics.

The need for reform was ignored as a vote loser in the 1970’s.
As is the need to discuss the problems of multi-culture today.
Representation and not policy controls Whitehall.
To the detriment of all peoples, but especially the English, Scots, and Welsh.

Hilary Clinton lost the democratic nomination mostly because for a few crucial months she was unable to generate enough finance. We have a two party system here because only two parties have the requisite finances. Money, not democracy, morality or legality controls all things. It has always been that way. But it has never been so far from the people’s control that even a revolution would change little. We no longer benefit from foreign investment, expertise, and labour, but are now instead dependent on it. This is tantamount to slavery. The three fastest growing international ‘trades’ are weapons, drugs, and people trafficking. The wealth created so vast that it becomes intertwined with governments and ‘legal’ business.

We are heading to every hellish nightmare depicted in every science-fiction writer’s worst imaginings. And as with Orwell’s 1984, good science-fiction simply takes current trends and ideologies to their natural conclusions.

The last thing of note, the ‘umbrella’ under which all things will pale, is of course world population. According to the E.U. set to rise from six billion to nine in the next fifty years. All in the Third World.

And with merely half of one of those billions being more than the entire white population of the world…

And all mass immigration being into Europe and the U.S….

Well…

Britain's Future Nightmare.

A Eurosat report for the European Commission estimated today that by 2060 Britain will have the highest population in the E.U. (77mil) thanks to immigration and immigrant birth rates.
Newsnight this same day showed hundreds of immigrants in France trying to enter Britain illegally. Those spoken to said how all immigrants know they will be moved on by every E.U. country apart from Britain. Many were trying for the twenteith time or more to enter here.
The programme also mentioned that vast numbers of their visa carrying counterparts simply arrive by plane with their student/visitor/whatever visas and then disappear into their communities when said visas run out.
It did not mention that by this same year, 2060, the U.N. estimates the world's population to have risen fron six billion to nine.
All in the third world.
Just half of one of those billions is more than all the white people on earth.
And with ALL mass immigration being on to white land, i.e. Europe/U.S., well.....

A sad indictment of immigration!

An 'independent' adviser accused Government of "leaving black youths to die" by cutting funding to community groups.
What a sad indictment of immigration!
If they're not given special treatment then immigrants will die.
While the poorest whites who have wanted immigration to stop for decades are again ignored.

He (adviser) said this as a black man was killed in Birmingham and police appealed to gang members for calm and asked them not to seek reprisals.
Asking gang members not to commit crimes or giving gang members money so they wont commit crimes, or to prevent them from dying apparently, is all part of the sign that says:
"Welcome to 'multicultural' Britain."

We should be deporting all immigrant gang members and educating the rest.

Immigration: An Inconvenient Truth.

I saw a repeat of the channel 4 programme 'investigating' the effect mass immigration has had on traditional British society.

I was not surprised that the whole programme refused to address the actual dangers of immigration. Instead they talked about the economic situation. That is irrelevant. Economies go up and down along with inflation and quality of life. The rich/poor divide varies. Governments change as do policies, and science makes 'breakthroughs' or makes mistakes.

Through ALL this is the constantly increasing segregation we have seen in Britain since the seventies. This natural gravitation to an individuals community is unaffected by ideology, legislation, money, cohesion, pleading, or science.

People are all the same. But because we are all the same we all need our sovereign identity, culture, and especially territory. THAT is the problem with immigration we see all around but choose to ignore.

"Forty years ago most visitors described Britain as homogeneous. That unlike the U.S. and other comparable countries there were relatively few important lines of division. Whereas race, religion and TERRITORY divided other countries, they did not in Britain."
Politics U.K. 5th Edition. (The standard text book for Advanced study in Government and Politics.)

No country in the whole history of civilization (I am a student of history) with more than one ethnicity has ever been anything but divided when numbers of those varied ethnicities and cultures become comparable. That doesn't mean full of hate, it means divided. Iraq, Zimbabwe, India (now Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India) the whole of Eastern Europe, China, the U.S. federal system,...everywhere.

And we British are no different to those people. If you set down the same situation and circumstances they tolerate then we will act as they do.

But simply; in the last thirty years successive governments have set down the roots of a Balkanisation in Britain that will cause decades, perhaps centuries, of resentment and intermittent civil-war.

Eastern Europeans are now leaving and businesses may collapse.
Why? Because Labour has made Britain DEPENDENT on foreign labour, investment and expertise rather than benefiting from it.
We teach immigrant kids English rather than educate our own children, (and still have up to thirty languages spoken in our schools) give concessions (multiculture), refuse job applications of white men,(claiming the need for minority representation - funny, I thought we were all just 'British' with shared values), fund minority only projects...
Business will collapse because Labour only cared about a short-term fix, not the future stability, safety, and cohesion of Britain.

A news item about teenage gangs said kids need an identity and a sense of belonging and so join their particular ethnic group. "It is better to be wanted for murder", said one, "than not wanted at all."
This is the basic reason for rising teenage and gang warfare; the loss of the homogeneous identity of England for English kids and tribal identities for immigrants whose Britain consists of a few streets within a isolated community or territory.
Leading to segregation and ethnic warfare, usually between non-English immigrants.
Or multiculture.

Politicians say a vote for the B.N.P. is a vote for hate. Yet when thousands voted for that party they didn't call all those voters hateful.
Why?
Because racism doesn't exist to 'mainstream' political thinking as anything more than a political tool.
Racial aggression is mostly about territorial disputes and survival. (Or nature)
And it follows balkanisation which follows immigration.

Stagnation and immigration don't mix.

The U.K. economy has stagnated after 63 consecutive quarters of growth, heightening recession fears and increasing the likelihood of more job losses.
At the same time we are receiving record immigration from the Third World.
The poorest people, least likely to speak English, and with the most children.
Stop all immigration from outside Europe.
There are literally millions wanting to come here.
And councils have a duty to our own people.
Especially the 1000 ex-British soldiers sleeping rough in London alone.

What consolation to the Native Americans is it that all in the U.S. call themselves American?

According to the Office for National Statistics it's estimated our population increases by a million every three years. Third world immigration and their high birth rate accounting for three-quarters of it. (Though this will increase exponentially rather than by a simple million each time of course.)
Why are we English more scared of being called racist than talking about how this situation has an ultimate, terrible consciequence if not stopped?
Is calling black men English their way of countering the claim we English are in danger of extinction?
The new Equalities Bill allows non-white preferential treatment and monies to go to 'minority' only organisations so unless there are different 'levels' of Englishness the law itself treats us differently.
Put simply: what consolation to the Native Americans is it that all in the U.S. call themselves American?

When is it anti-white?

A young black man was tragically killed recently in what the police described as a racially motivated attack as the attacker use a racial epithet.
However I did wonder in these instances how you can tell if an attack is racist against a white man.
Because white trash seems pretty tame.
Bearing in mind a racial element adds to a sentence.

"Anti-fascists" and their morality.

"Anti-fascists" clashed with riot police outside the British National Party's annual festival. They pelted police with stones, scared the families of party members, and around 33 were arrested.
These must be the same civic-minded, morally superior, fair-minded "anti-fascists" who called for the death of the student debate team leader at Oxford when he invited the leader of the B.N.P. to talk.
Enough said.

Again....why the silence about this nonsense?

15/8/08
Labour and Tory idiots talk of how under their respective administrations more police would be put on the streets - seemingly oblivious to this endorsement of their own failure.
FIX THE LEAK! Don't give us more men to bail out the water!

Social Engineering Is Killing Education.

15/8/08
It has been reported this day that the gap between the educational standard of pupils in fee-paying schools to state school pupils has widened greatly under Labour.
It is also reported elsewhere this same day that some 240 languages other than English are spoken in our schools.
Enough said.

Origin8

Starting Point: Can't tell you how frustrated I feel.....with the silence.

"Forty years ago most visitors described Britain as homogeneous. That unlike the U.S. and other comparable countries there were relatively few important lines of division. Whereas race, religion and TERRITORY divided other countries, they did not in Britain."
Politics U.K. 5th Edition. (The standard text book for Advanced study in Government and Politics.)